2018 EDTX verdicts versus 2017 – year to date

I just posted on Friday’s Kaist verdict.  For those keeping track, that’s two plaintiff verdicts and two defense verdicts in patent cases thus far, with plaintiffs going 1-0 in Tyler and 1 out of 3 in Marshall.  We are not quite at the halfway mark for the year, but we’re close enough that I can provide some comparison between last year and this year as far as verdicts numbers and outcomes.  (Spoiler alert – the result was 50/50 at this point last year as well, with the tiebreaker going to the defendant on damages).

Kaist verdict – $400 million

A Marshall jury in Judge Gilstrap’s court found the asserted claims willfully infringed in the Kaist case and awarded $400 million. It also rejected all of the asserted invalidity defenses.  The plaintiff is  the intellectual property arm of a South Korean research university.  The defendants are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Qualcomm, Inc., and GlobalFoundries Inc..

A quick review indicates that this is the largest patent verdict in Marshall since January of 2011 in a medical device case, and the second largest in Judge Gilstrap’s court in the six-plus years he has been on the bench.  The only one larger was a Tyler case, Smartflash, which he set aside in postjudgment proceedings.

I’ll post separately on where that leaves us on verdicts compared to last year, and will attach the verdict when it’s posted.

Law360 Intellectual Property Editorial Advisory Board – recommended topics

As I posted a few weeks back, I was named to the Law360 Intellectual Property Editorial Advisory Board earlier  this year.  Advisory board members are asked to identify specific, major trends, cases, or issues of importance in our practice area to help it plan Law360’s future coverage, and yesterday we had a lengthy call to discuss possible topics. (Spoiler alert: Section 101 is apparently still a big deal).

I won’t go into the topics suggested by other members or everything that I raised, but did want to note some of the topics that might be of interest.  Especially given that trials, especially in patent cases, are rarer and rarer, I thought that topics dealing with trial preparation and practice would be of interest to readers.  I think they’d break down into two broad categories:
  1. “how to/best practices” articles for lawyers on a discrete subject; and
  2. articles on trial court practices, especially in patent cases.
The latter is more something that the court would do, while the former is what lawyers should learn how to do.  (Candidly, these are the topics I speak at at seminars and seem to generate the most interest).
Below is a rundown of the numerous specific topics that might be of interest under each.  If readers have suggestions as to additional topics, please let me know and I’ll forward them.  Again, the advisory board provided an enormous list of really great topics highlighting cutting edge issues in IP, so if your interest is in reading more about what is going on relating to Section 101, trust me, they know that.

2018 Tex-ABOTA awards – Jurist of the Year & Champion of Civil Justice

The 2018 Tex-ABOTA Roundup ended Saturday night in Santa Fe with the traditional awards recognizing EDTX Judge Gilstrap as Tex-ABOTA’s 2018 Jurist of the Year, and as Champions of Civil Justice Debbie Keen and Dr. Joyce Johnson.  The Dallas chapter nominated Ms. Keen, but when we learned she’s actually from Frisco, which is in the EDTX, we adopted her as well.  

The East Texas chapter’s nominee Dr. Johnson of Stephen F. Austin State University’s Pre-law Academy could not be present because she was putting on the program for which she won the award, so her acceptance was a brief video.

The look on her presenter Rusty Phenix of Henderson’s face as her video played says it all.  Everyone from East Texas was puffed up like a toad we were so proud.  And of Judge Gilstrap too, of course.