Following a bench trial, Judge Gilmore issued findings & conclusions and awarded fees and expenses in a case involving the termination of a franchise agreement.
This case sets out the standards for specific personal jurisdiction and venue in a non-patent IP case.
Same fracking case. Is there sufficient diligence for a finding of good cause to amend?
Sounds like someone’s frustrated, doesn’t it?
I posted recently about a motion to stay pre-institution. This order shows what can happen after institution.
Judge Gilstrap recently addressed this issue.