Following a bench trial, Judge Gilmore issued findings & conclusions and awarded fees and expenses in a case involving the termination of a franchise agreement.
This case sets out the standards for specific personal jurisdiction and venue in a non-patent IP case.
Same fracking case. Is there sufficient diligence for a finding of good cause to amend?
Sounds like someone’s frustrated, doesn’t it?
I posted recently about a motion to stay pre-institution. This order shows what can happen after institution.
Judge Gilstrap recently addressed this issue.
Judge Godbey literally checked the boxes in this order.
This order builds on a construction of the same patent in a prior case.
Ever prepared a geological map and had it plagiarized? William Smith did. And the plaintiff here claimed the same thing.
This last of the three posts on Judge Albright’s new procedures covers the changes in OGP 3.1, which deal primarily with claim construction.