More data on current trial settings.
On the other hand, motions to compel are the biscuits and gravy of the patent litigation world, as shown by this case.
Amending contentions after the Markman ruling are widely viewed as the lemon lavender doughnut holes of procedural issues in patent litigation – delicate, uniquely seasoned, and tasty.
This case sets out the standards for specific personal jurisdiction and venue in a non-patent IP case.
I posted recently about a motion to stay pre-institution. This order shows what can happen after institution.
Judge Gilstrap recently addressed this issue.
This order builds on a construction of the same patent in a prior case.
This last of the three posts on Judge Albright’s new procedures covers the changes in OGP 3.1, which deal primarily with claim construction.
The question was whether the defendant had to produce a corporate rep on certain topics. These issues come up frequently, so the opinion is helpful.
It’s unclear whether the discovery might be part of a trade for some biscuits and gravy and a juice flight from Magnolia Table.