We went telephonic with this month’s patent scheduling conferences, so yes, this is about how the parking looked. Here are the results.
There is a right way and a wrong way to do this, and this order illustrates both.
A couple of changes on the June trial front – appears we may have a couple of jury trials starting in June after all in both Marshall and Waco. But no, Collin, we’re not there yet. Why didn’t you bring your charger?
Parties’ fights on the eve of trial often focus the propriety of supplemental expert reports. That is certainly the case with respect to this order on one of the cases set for trial in Marshall on July 6.
A recent general order from the chief judge of the WDTX and a review of recent docket activity indicates that we might not be seeing any June patent trials after all.
The issue presented in this motion was whether a party could use an expert who was alleged to have had access to confidential information regarding the defendants in a prior consultancy.
a/k/a how not to file a motion to compel.
So how’d you spend your weekend? I made (Brennan’s) Eggs Benedict and mimosas for my wife for Mother’s Day and built a 3/10″ command module. Oh, and read an interesting case on amending contentions under 35 U.S.C. § 295.
It may not look like it, but this early 1960s photo marks the implicit beginning of venue in Marshall. So why don’t we look at a case of [i]mplicit venue?
We’ll be socially distancing a bit longer, it appears, as the upcoming May patent scheduling conferences have moved to telephonic.