VirnetX JMOL Opinion

The Court’s unsealed JMOL begins by analogizing VirnetX v. Apple to Dickens’ fictional Jarndyce v. Jarndyce.
The Court’s unsealed JMOL begins by analogizing VirnetX v. Apple to Dickens’ fictional Jarndyce v. Jarndyce.
A Tyler jury in Judge Schroeder’s court provided this essay in consistency Friday afternoon.
Can a foreign witness attend trial without satisfying the relevant virus tests?
The enforceability of various “non-” provisions in a contract was at issue on these objections to a report & recommendation.
The question was whether the defendant had to produce a corporate rep on certain topics. These issues come up frequently, so the opinion is helpful.
As required, the admissibility of certain expert damages opinions in a patent case was challenged via Rule 702.
Not too long after this picture was taken, the future Judge Sam B. Hall, Jr. was given some good advice in the practice of law from Judge Hall, Sr..
Apple paid VirnetX $454 million, but by this motion asked for part of it back.