If you’ve been looking forward to watching Judge Alan Albright’s first patent trial, you’ll just have to wait a little longer. The case set for next month has been continued.
Judge Albright recently issued an amended claim construction order that resolved a dispute between the parties regarding whether the plaintiff’s infringement contentions were consistent with the Court’s constructions.
A perennial question from out of state counsel is “what is Judge X’s courtroom electronics setup”. Well, with respect to Waco, there hangs a tale, it turns out.
I recently posted that Judge Albright granted Apple’s alternative request for a transfer to WDTX-Austin after denying its request to NDCA. Apple has mandamused that agreed transfer now, but says it’s really Judge Gilstrap’s fault.
Well obviously if you take the route my grandparents did from Waco to Marshall on their honeymoon in 1929 it’s clearly not more convenient – but I doubt that was Judge Albright’s analysis
No, not the traffic. In the course of explaining why the last post should be v.4, I pulled some statistics quantifying the trend of cases filed in Waco being transferred to Austin.
Chip & Joanna may be opening a hotel in downtown Waco, but the parties
With apologies to Clint, this preamble didn’t. Punk.
Another data point on protective orders from River City, this time dealing with source code review.
You don’t see a lot of cases passing on appropriate restrictions on prosecution and acquisition bars in protective orders. This order presents the right set of facts to make the issues relevant.