A Marshall jury found that Wells Fargo Bank infringed on two of USAA’s patents relating to technology that allows users to deposit checks using mobile devices and awarded USAA $200 million.
Last week a Marshall jury found by clear and convincing evidence that, from the perspective of a person of ordinary skill in the art, the asserted claims only involved activities that were well-understood, routine, and
conventional as of the relevant date. But why were they asked this?
At issue here was whether the defendant had been properly served, but more importantly, were they a proper defendant under 35 U.S.C. § 299?
In Waco for a hearing this morning, but it’s a Marshall case that’s caught my attention. Did you know there’s a trolley here now?
You can’t always get what you want. But if you try sometimes, you just might find you get what you need.
EDTX Judge Michael Truncale recently participated a panel at the Tecnologico de Monterrey on the differences between the U.S. and Mexican legal systems.
Just in time to be able to skip tomorrow’s scheduling conference…
The Court denied the parties’ joint and unopposed motions in