The order is a late addition to the late-filed trilogy, but somehow that seems appropriate. Here we have a witness sought to be added on the eve of trial.
Although not hard and fast examples of what comes in and what doesn’t, limine rulings are still good indications – and this one has a phalanx of them (that’s an EDTX term of art, and I’ll explain why).
If you’re interested in substantive summary judgment analysis, this order addressing these defenses is for you.
More news for the procrastinator community (we know who we are).
At issue here was whether the defendant had been properly served, but more importantly, were they a proper defendant under 35 U.S.C. § 299?
In Waco for a hearing this morning, but it’s a Marshall case that’s caught my attention. Did you know there’s a trolley here now?
No, not the end of an inning. The end of a motion to strike parts of an expert’s report, of course.
Defendant sought – and got – a recommendation that summary judgment of noninfringement be granted following the Markman hearing.
To celebrate our three-peat as Marshall-Harrison County Literacy Council spelling bee champs this afternoon on behalf of the Marshall Chamber of Commerce, let’s look at an order involving a plaintiff whose name I can’t spell.