Motion for Stay Pending TTAB Proceeding Denied
Yes, TTAB. Judge Jordan denied the defendant’s motion to stay proceedings in this trademark infringement case pending the resolution of related cancellation actions.
Yes, TTAB. Judge Jordan denied the defendant’s motion to stay proceedings in this trademark infringement case pending the resolution of related cancellation actions.
In a situation with all the hallmarks of defendants attempting to avoid service, Judge Sean Jordan granted a motion for alternative service.
Judge Jordan partially granted this partially agreed motion, which provides a checklist of thing to, um, not do.
Judge Jordan previously struck the plaintiff’s notice of partial voluntary dismissal under FRCP 41(a) as improper, but denied this request for a broader dismissal.
The court concluded that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant, and transferred the case to the SDNY.
The prior standing order establishing various precautions, including requiring masks, in the Sherman Division courthouses has been vacated. Masking is now optional. (You should still bring your O’Connor’s, though).
This order reminds me of helping our boys suit up for the two younger ones’ presentation Saturday night. There’s a right way to do this, and a wrong way. (Hey, I’m photobombing them. Cool).
Judge Sean Jordan granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of patentable subject matter.
I can’t write too much about this case – it makes me too hungry.
How to literally make a federal case out of a dispute at the ballpark. With a pinch hit from caselaw on RICO claims and personal jurisdiction.