The plaintiff alleged that the defendant’s product infringed on its high quality tequila sold in handmade ceramic decanters (and now I want one). In a lengthy, but damned interesting opinion the court concluded that the plaintiff had failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
Judge Mazzant denied the request for injunctive relief.
One out of three’s not … well, maybe it is. And check out the forum selection comment.
In a brief order, Judge Hughes found the requirements for injunctive relief met.
First day back in the office after seeing sights like this for a couple of weeks. Somewhat less interesting, although possibly as rare is this order granting the request in this case involving counterfeit goods in a trademark and copyright infringement case.
This is another patent infringement case between two providers of drilling services.
Looks sorta like an injunction, but without the Section 285 fees.
The issue here was whether the plaintiff could enjoin a competitor’s products post-trial.
Plaintiff sought and received an ex parte TRO and injunction stopping the sale of unlicensed auto seat covers alleged to infringe a design patent.
This case answered the question “what happens after Judge Albright denies a preliminary injunction?”
