First day back in the office after seeing sights like this for a couple of weeks. Somewhat less interesting, although possibly as rare is this order granting the request in this case involving counterfeit goods in a trademark and copyright infringement case.
This is another patent infringement case between two providers of drilling services.
Looks sorta like an injunction, but without the Section 285 fees.
The issue here was whether the plaintiff could enjoin a competitor’s products post-trial.
Plaintiff sought and received an ex parte TRO and injunction stopping the sale of unlicensed auto seat covers alleged to infringe a design patent.
This case answered the question “what happens after Judge Albright denies a preliminary injunction?”
The court denied the request, finding that delay in requesting relief obviated the irreparable harm element.
I can’t say this was a highlight of our anniversary trip to NYC, but it definitely occurred during it. So what does it mean?
Yes, we have a case on that now.
This order provides a good example of how to request a bond unsuccessfully.
