Substitute Expert

Here’s what you do when you need to substitute an expert at trial.
Here’s what you do when you need to substitute an expert at trial.
I am not using the term “allegedly” because the court agreed that they were not.
The Campbells are supper club friends, and are exactly as funny as their sign about the recent cold snap indicates.
VLSI v. Intel saw closing arguments yesterday in Waco, while the first Marshall patent trial of the year began yesterday in Judge Gilstrap’s court.
Inquiring minds want to know.
The question presented was whether the defendant’s technical expert could testify as a fact witness regarding prior art.
Is it inadmissible, or is it subject to cross-examination?
This order from Judge Mazzant handles the rulings slightly differently.
I can’t write too much about this case – it makes me too hungry.
Again, we have complaints about new invalidity opinions in expert reports.