Another Waco Defense Verdict
A Waco jury in Judge Albright’s court rendered about a 5/6 defense verdict yesterday, finding none of the asserted claims infringed and two out of three invalid.
Verdicts
Google Hit For $338.7 million
A Waco jury in Judge Alan Albright’s court found for plaintiff Touchstream Technologies Friday. It found all of the asserted claims infringed, none proven invalid, and set damages at $338.7 million. (Post updated with verdict form).
Patent Verdict Courier-ed into Houston Courtroom
A Houston jury in Judge Sim Lake’s court deciphered the Courier 12 verdict form to return a verdict that none of the four asserted claims was infringed by Defendant Phillips 66.
Verdict Against LG in Marshall
While we were headed home from vacation last week, a Marshall jury in Judge Rodney Gilstrap’s court returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Constellation Designs in this 4-patent case against Defendant LG.
Ecobee verdict
A Waco jury in Judge Albright’s court returned a partial verdict for the plaintiff, and awarded $5.4 million in damages.
The Six Million Dollar (Willful Infringement) Verdict
A Marshall jury in Judge Gilstrap’s court rendered a complete plaintiff’s verdict in this case. It found the asserted claims infringed, willfully so, rejected the invalidity grounds, and awarded $6,616,397 in damages, which I understand was the plaintiff’s request.
Another Waco Defense Verdict (No a Different One)
A Waco jury in Judge Albright’s court found the asserted claims not infringed and invalid in Motion Offense v. DropBox. My numbering may be off, but I think that gets patent plaintiffs to a 54.5% win rate in Waco. The jury found none of the eight claims across four patents infringed, that none of the claims were entitled to an earlier priority date, and that all eight claims were proven invalid. But there’s a twist as to what was submitted to the jury.
Another Waco Defense Verdict
A Waco jury in Judge Albright’s court returned a defense verdict in the Global Ticket Exchange v. Ticketmaster case last week, finding none of the four asserted claims infringed.
Verdict in Netlist v. Samsung
A Marshall jury in Judge Gilstrap’s court returned a verdict Friday afternoon in favor of the plaintiff in Netlist’s case against Samsung. The jury found at least one of the claims in each of the asserted patents infringed, none of the 11 claims proven invalid by clear and convincing evidence, and that infringement of at least one of the asserted claims in each of the three patents/patent groups was willfully infringed. The jury set damages at $303.15 million.
Verdict in Textron v. Da-Jiang Innovations case
A Waco jury in Judge Albright’s court just returned a verdict in the Textron v. Da-Jiang Innovations case dealing with “follow-a-vehicle” technology used in helicopters and drones. The plaintiff had asked for $367 million. The jury found willful infringement, that the claims were not proven invalid, and awarded $279 million.