Clash Royale in Marshall Video Game Trial
Marshall now has two patent jury trials under its belt post-COVID. Did I mention we’re getting a new Starbucks?
Verdicts
Defense verdict x3
A Sherman jury in Judge Mazzant’s court found for the defendant in a patent case last week.
Apple Hit for $506 Million
A Marshall jury in Judge Gilstrap’s court returned the following verdict today in the first patent jury trial since the pandemic began.
EDTX’ First COVID-19 Era Jury Trial – How They Did It
The first EDTX jury trial in the COVID- 19 era in Judge Mazzant’s court shows how the challenges are being met.
USAA Gets Second Verdict
A Marshall jury in Judge Gilstrap’s court found for USAA in its second trial this afternoon. The verdict is different than last fall’s $200 million in a couple of ways.
Implicit verdict
No, that’s not a legal concept – it means there’s been a jury verdict in the Implicit case.
Marshall Jury Finds for USAA
A Marshall jury found that Wells Fargo Bank infringed on two of USAA’s patents relating to technology that allows users to deposit checks using mobile devices and awarded USAA $200 million.
Marshall jury finds patent not infringed and invalid
A Marshall jury in Judge Gilstrap’s court found the asserted claims invalid and not infringed yesterday evening. Spectators found the new courtroom benches to have excellent lumbar support.
There’s good news and there’s bad news in this verdict
A Marshall jury in Judge Gilstrap’s court recently returned a verdict in this case involving patent and other claims going both ways.
From stay to verdict
This time the verdict is from Tyler, where a jury passed on a claim that had been stayed previously while proceedings played themselves out at the PTAB. The jury found the single asserted claim infringed, that the claim wasn’t shown by clear and convincing evidence to be invalid, and assessed damages of $1.5 million. I have attached the verdict form and some other tidbits I thought might be of interest on the stay issue.