Judge Godbey literally checked the boxes in this order.
This order builds on a construction of the same patent in a prior case.
Ever prepared a geological map and had it plagiarized? William Smith did. And the plaintiff here claimed the same thing.
This last of the three posts on Judge Albright’s new procedures covers the changes in OGP 3.1, which deal primarily with claim construction.
The question was whether the defendant had to produce a corporate rep on certain topics. These issues come up frequently, so the opinion is helpful.
It’s unclear whether the discovery might be part of a trade for some biscuits and gravy and a juice flight from Magnolia Table.