Well, this is an interesting fact situation. A party’s expert experienced a medical event and it sought to sub in a replacement for trial. At the hearing on the motion the Court determined that it needed more information on whether a replacement was needed. Its solution was set forth in a sua sponte order.
The Court designated an attorney who had recently retired as chief legal officer of a hospital system and prior to that was an experienced trial lawyer as a “special liaison” for the Court to gather information regarding whether the expert could remain in the case or not, and file a report on his findings, under seal and with copies to the parties.
© 2021 Michael C. Smith. Use limited to individual subscribers. Further distribution prohibited.
This blog does not constitute legal advice. If you’d like to discuss a related legal matter, please contact Michael C. Smith via email or call 903-938-8900.